2
Shared Ingredients
Kiehl's Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm vs Kiehl's s Facial Fuel
Comparing Kiehl's Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm versus Kiehl's s Facial Fuel — shared ingredients, unique components, comedogenic & irritancy ratings and unique benefits.
Comparison Overview
14
Unique to Kiehl's Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm
42
Unique to Kiehl's s Facial Fuel
Kiehl's s Facial Fuel has a lower comedogenic rating, making it the safer pick for acne-prone skin. Kiehl's Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm scores lower on irritancy, which may suit sensitive skin better. Both products share 2 ingredients in common. Kiehl's Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm has 14 unique ingredients while Kiehl's s Facial Fuel has 42.
Skin Safety Profile
20%
Comedogenic
10 rated
80%
Safe
15 rated
20%
Irritant
15 rated
Based on 15 rated ingredient s
15%
Comedogenic
20 rated
79%
Safe
42 rated
27%
Irritant
41 rated
Based on 42 rated ingredient s
Ingredient Analysis Matrix
Scale 1 2 3 4 5 low → high
C = Comedogenic S = Safety risk IR = Irritancy
Shared Ingredients (2)
1
Ingredients — Unique to Kiehl's Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm
SqualaneCSIREthylhexyl PalmitateCSIRCera MicrocristallinaCSIRMicrocrystalline WaxCSIRPolyethyleneCSIRIsopropyl PalmitateCSIRPrunus Armeniaca Kernel OilCSIRButyrospermum Parkii ButterCSIROzokeriteCSIRMentha Piperita OilCSIRSimmondsia Chinensis ButterCSIRPrunus Amygdalus Dulcis SeedCSIRSodium SaccharinCSIRApricot Kernel OilCSIR
2
Ingredients — Unique to Kiehl's s Facial Fuel
WaterCSIRCyclohexasiloxaneCSIRAlcohol Denat.CSIRGlycerinCSIRButylene GlycolCSIRDimethiconeCSIRPanthenolCSIRTriethanolamineCSIRAscorbyl GlucosideCSIRGlyceryl LinoleateCSIRPhenoxyethanolCSIRPolyperfluoromethylisopropyl EtherCSIRPolyacrylamideCSIRDimethiconolCSIRGlyceryl OleateCSIRCarbomerCSIRCetyl AlcoholCSIRC13-14 IsoparaffinCSIRParfumCSIRAcrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate CrosspolymerCSIRMethylparabenCSIRGlycine Soja OilCSIRCaffeineCSIRTocopherolCSIRHydrogenated LecithinCSIRRosa Damascena ExtractCSIRBenzophenone-4CSIRMentholCSIRPeg-100 StearateCSIRGlyceryl StearateCSIRLaureth-7CSIRHydrolyzed Soy ProteinCSIRPotassium Cetyl PhosphateCSIRButylparabenCSIRDisodium EDTACSIREthylparabenCSIRGlyceryl LinolenateCSIRPropylparabenCSIRCitrus Aurantium Dulcis JuiceCSIRCitrus Limon JuiceCSIRCitralCSIRVitamin ECSIR
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kiehl's Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm better than Kiehl's s Facial Fuel for sensitive skin?
By comparing Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm and s Facial Fuel side-by-side, you can identify which product has fewer irritants and a better safety profile for sensitive skin. Check the irritancy ratings in the comparison matrix above.
Which product, Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm or s Facial Fuel, is safer for acne-prone skin?
The comparison tool highlights comedogenic (pore-clogging) ingredients in both Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm and s Facial Fuel. Review the comedogenic ratings above to see which formulation is less likely to cause breakouts.
Do Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm and s Facial Fuel share any ingredients?
Our ingredient analysis matrix lists all shared ingredients as well as those unique to either Facial Fuel No Shine Moisturising Lip Balm or s Facial Fuel.
Popular Skincare Comparisons
CeraVe Hydrating Facial Cleanser vs La Roche-Posay Toleriane Hydrating Gentle Face Cleanser
Compare
The Ordinary Niacinamide 10% + Zinc 1% vs The Inkey List Niacinamide Serum
Compare
Laneige Water Bank Blue Hyaluronic Cream vs Tatcha The Water Cream
Compare
Paula's Choice Skin Perfecting 2% BHA vs Drunk Elephant T.L.C. Framboos Glycolic Serum
Compare
Cosrx Advanced Snail 96 Mucin Power Essence vs Beauty of Joseon Repair Serum
Compare
Beauty of Joseon Relief Sun Rice & Probiotics vs Isntree Hyaluronic Acid Watery Sun Gel SPF50+
Compare