SkinWis
SkinWis Scientific

Sarah Chapman Skinesis Eye Recovery vs Sarah Chapman Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster

Comparing Sarah Chapman Skinesis Eye Recovery versus Sarah Chapman Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster — shared ingredients, unique components, comedogenic & irritancy ratings and unique benefits.

Comparison Overview

10

Shared Ingredients

69

Unique to Sarah Chapman Skinesis Eye Recovery

19

Unique to Sarah Chapman Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster

Sarah Chapman Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster has a lower comedogenic rating, making it the safer pick for acne-prone skin. Sarah Chapman Skinesis Eye Recovery scores lower on irritancy, which may suit sensitive skin better. Both products share 10 ingredients in common. Sarah Chapman Skinesis Eye Recovery has 69 unique ingredients while Sarah Chapman Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster has 19.

Skin Safety Profile

Ingredient Analysis Matrix

Scale 1 2 3 4 5 low → high
C = Comedogenic S = Safety risk IR = Irritancy
1

Ingredients — Unique to Sarah Chapman Skinesis Eye Recovery

Cetearyl OlivateCSIRIsopropyl PalmitateCSIRPhenyl TrimethiconeCSIRSorbitan OlivateCSIRButylene GlycolCSIRCaprylic/Capric TriglycerideCSIRCetearyl AlcoholCSIRCetyl AlcoholCSIRGlyceryl StearateCSIRPeg-100 StearateCSIRSodium Hyaluronate CrosspolymerCSIRTetrahexyldecyl AscorbateCSIRPlantago Lanceolata Leaf ExtractCSIRCrithmum Maritimum ExtractCSIRHesperidin Methyl ChalconeCSIRTeprenoneCSIRDipeptide Diaminobutyroyl Benzylamide DiacetateCSIRPalmitoyl Tripeptide-5CSIRN-HydroxysuccinimideCSIRDipeptide-2CSIRPalmitoyl Tetrapeptide-7CSIRPalmitoyl Pentapeptide-4CSIRChrysinCSIRPalmitoyl Tripeptide-1CSIRDicetyl PhosphateCSIRCeteth-10 PhosphateCSIRSteareth-20CSIRAcetyl TyrosineCSIRProlineCSIRHydrolyzed Vegetable ProteinCSIRAdenosine TriphosphateCSIREthylhexyl PalmitateCSIRSilica Dimethyl SilylateCSIRSodium HyaluronateCSIRHexylresorcinolCSIRPpg-12/Smdi CopolymerCSIRTriethanolamineCSIRSaccharide IsomerateCSIRDimethylaminoethanol TartrateCSIRStearyl GlycyrrhetinateCSIRRetinyl PalmitateCSIRThioctic AcidCSIRCarnosineCSIRUbiquinoneCSIRTocopheryl AcetateCSIRTricholoma Matsutake ExtractCSIRSantalum Album ExtractCSIRPhellodendron Amurense Bark ExtractCSIRHordeum Distichon ExtractCSIRMicaCSIRIris Florentina Root ExtractCSIRJasminum Officinale Flower ExtractCSIRLilium Candidum Bulb ExtractCSIRDipotassium GlycyrrhizateCSIRAloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice PowderCSIRPeg-8CSIRTocopherolCSIRAscorbyl PalmitateCSIRAscorbic AcidCSIRCitric AcidCSIRSilicaCSIRCarbomerCSIRDisodium EDTACSIRCi 77163CSIRCi 77891CSIRForm of vitamin ECSIRVitamin ECSIRDerivative of vitamin CCSIRVitamin CCSIR

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sarah Chapman Skinesis Eye Recovery better than Sarah Chapman Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster for sensitive skin?

By comparing Skinesis Eye Recovery and Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster side-by-side, you can identify which product has fewer irritants and a better safety profile for sensitive skin. Check the irritancy ratings in the comparison matrix above.

Which product, Skinesis Eye Recovery or Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster, is safer for acne-prone skin?

The comparison tool highlights comedogenic (pore-clogging) ingredients in both Skinesis Eye Recovery and Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster. Review the comedogenic ratings above to see which formulation is less likely to cause breakouts.

Do Skinesis Eye Recovery and Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster share any ingredients?

Our ingredient analysis matrix lists all shared ingredients as well as those unique to either Skinesis Eye Recovery or Skinesis Skin Tone Perfecting Booster.

Popular Skincare Comparisons