9
Shared Ingredients
Philosophy Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate vs Philosophy Hope In A Tube
Comparing Philosophy Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate versus Philosophy Hope In A Tube — shared ingredients, unique components, comedogenic & irritancy ratings and unique benefits.
Comparison Overview
31
Unique to Philosophy Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate
25
Unique to Philosophy Hope In A Tube
Philosophy Hope In A Tube has a lower comedogenic rating, making it the safer pick for acne-prone skin. Philosophy Hope In A Tube scores lower on irritancy, which may suit sensitive skin better. Both products share 9 ingredients in common. Philosophy Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate has 31 unique ingredients while Philosophy Hope In A Tube has 25.
Skin Safety Profile
14%
Comedogenic
21 rated
78%
Safe
37 rated
31%
Irritant
35 rated
Based on 37 rated ingredient s
0%
Comedogenic
15 rated
89%
Safe
27 rated
15%
Irritant
26 rated
Based on 27 rated ingredient s
Ingredient Analysis Matrix
Scale 1 2 3 4 5 low → high
C = Comedogenic S = Safety risk IR = Irritancy
Shared Ingredients (9)
1
Ingredients — Unique to Philosophy Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate
Cetyl AlcoholCSIRParfumCSIRGlyceryl StearateCSIRNeopentyl Glycol Dicaprylate/DicaprateCSIRTridecyl StearateCSIRDimethiconeCSIRIsopropyl MyristateCSIRCetyl EstersCSIRStearic AcidCSIRPalmitic AcidCSIRPhenoxyethanolCSIRTriethanolamineCSIRC12-15 Alkyl EthylhexanoateCSIRTridecyl TrimellitateCSIRLimoneneCSIRButyrospermum Parkii ButterCSIRCarbomerCSIRCitronellolCSIREthylhexylglycerinCSIRMacadamia Ternifolia Seed OilCSIROlea Europaea Fruit OilCSIRAloe Barbadensis Leaf JuiceCSIRGeraniolCSIRAlpha-Isomethyl IononeCSIRBenzyl BenzoateCSIRLinaloolCSIRCitralCSIRPotassium SorbateCSIRSodium BenzoateCSIRCitric AcidCSIRAloe Vera leaf juiceCSIR
2
Ingredients — Unique to Philosophy Hope In A Tube
SqualaneCSIRParaffinum Liquidum/ Mineral oilCSIRIsocetyl Stearoyl StearateCSIRButylene GlycolCSIRPetrolatumCSIRPolyglyceryl-2 DiisostearateCSIRPeg-30 DipolyhydroxystearateCSIRMagnesium SulfateCSIRPhytosteryl/Octyldodecyl Lauroyl GlutamateCSIRPotassium Ascorbyl Tocopheryl PhosphateCSIRDipalmitoyl HydroxyprolineCSIRLecithinCSIRAdenosineCSIRBisabololCSIRMicrocrystalline WaxCSIRCera MicrocristallinaCSIRPolyethyleneCSIRPolyaminopropyl BiguanideCSIRPolysorbate 80CSIRBenzyl AlcoholCSIRFarnesolCSIRTriethoxycaprylylsilaneCSIRChlorphenesinCSIRIron OxidesCSIRMineral OilCSIR
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Philosophy Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate better than Philosophy Hope In A Tube for sensitive skin?
By comparing Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate and Hope In A Tube side-by-side, you can identify which product has fewer irritants and a better safety profile for sensitive skin. Check the irritancy ratings in the comparison matrix above.
Which product, Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate or Hope In A Tube, is safer for acne-prone skin?
The comparison tool highlights comedogenic (pore-clogging) ingredients in both Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate and Hope In A Tube. Review the comedogenic ratings above to see which formulation is less likely to cause breakouts.
Do Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate and Hope In A Tube share any ingredients?
Our ingredient analysis matrix lists all shared ingredients as well as those unique to either Hands of Hope Fig and Pomegranate or Hope In A Tube.
Popular Skincare Comparisons
CeraVe Hydrating Facial Cleanser vs La Roche-Posay Toleriane Hydrating Gentle Face Cleanser
Compare
The Ordinary Niacinamide 10% + Zinc 1% vs The Inkey List Niacinamide Serum
Compare
Laneige Water Bank Blue Hyaluronic Cream vs Tatcha The Water Cream
Compare
Paula's Choice Skin Perfecting 2% BHA vs Drunk Elephant T.L.C. Framboos Glycolic Serum
Compare
Cosrx Advanced Snail 96 Mucin Power Essence vs Beauty of Joseon Repair Serum
Compare
Beauty of Joseon Relief Sun Rice & Probiotics vs Isntree Hyaluronic Acid Watery Sun Gel SPF50+
Compare